Send this page to a friend! (click here)

The Best and the Worst of Unitarian Universalism

September 19, 2004

First Universalist Unitarian Church ~ www.uuwausau.org

Rev. Paul Beckel

 

 

Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us.

Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas

 

It’s not just the books under fire now that worry me.

It is the books that will never be written. The books that will never be read.

And all due to the fear of censorship. As always, young readers will be the real losers.

Judy Blume

 

To criticize is not to reject. This point must be emphasized, for it is the dividing line between the free mind and fanaticism. It is the doorway to a universal religion that rigorously seeks the truth,

and yet is also inclusive and welcoming to all.

Rev. Ken Patton

 

I had heard of you with my ears; but now my eyes have seen you.
Job 42:5

 

 

Opening Words

Love is the spirit of this church, and service is its gift.

This is our great covenant: to dwell together in peace,

To seek the truth in love, and to help one another.

 

Great words. But what do they mean?! Well, the beautiful thing, and the troublesome thing, is that they mean something a little different to every one of us.

 

This an awkward way to run a religion. Maybe the worst way, except for all the other ways.

 

The trouble with all this individual interpretation... is that others, or we ourselves, may distort, exaggerate, or innocently misunderstand our heritage and principles.

 

Today I would like us to consider the best, and the worst, that is within our Unitarian Universalist tradition. If you’re here for the first time, you may learn some things about us that are unsettling.  If you’re here for the 500th, or 2000th time, and/or you really love this religious movement, you may be offended by what you hear.  Fortunately, you can come back next week when Julie Stoneberg will preach on “Forgiveness.”

 

CHILDREN’S FOCUS                                   The Bee Tree                      Patricia Polacco

Summary: Since Mary Ellen is tired of reading, Grandpa leads her on a romp through the countryside chasing a bee to its tree.  Many others from town join the chase. In the end, they enjoy the honey they find. But the more important lesson comes later, when grandpa puts a dab of honey on Mary Ellen’s book cover, invites her to taste the sweetness...and reminds her that wisdom and learning come through a similar adventure, sometimes exhausting, chasing for truth and meaning through the pages of a book.

 

 

from “Universalism: Beyond Christianity” Brainard Gibbons 

Brainard Gibbons was minister of this congregation from 1941 to 1943, and 1946 to 1953, before becoming General Superintendent of the Universalist Church in America. The following is an excerpt from a flyer Gibbons wrote to describe Universalism:

 

A confused humanity anxiously awaits some clear voice proclaiming that religion is one. That is the answer of Universalism....

 

We [would] prefer to be a positive factor in the social equation, and [be] hated, than to be nothing and be ignored. It is better to risk hate now for the future generations than to court respectable oblivion.

 

[For we do not] put new wine into old bottles, else the bottles break, and the wine run[s] out....

but [we] put new wine into new bottles and both are preserved....

 

 

from The New UU Voice, Summer 2004

The New UU Voice is a publication—independent of the UUA—which offers a consistently tough, critical look at UU congregational life with hope, and affection.  This article is a collection of metaphors describing our congregations suggested by clergy and lay leaders from around the country. Some are warm, some are harsh. They may not be easy to hear. But it may be helpful to know that much of what we struggle with, and celebrate, is not unique to First UU Church, Wausau.  There are aspects of our history, our values, our governance structures which—combined with the dynamics of human groups of any kind—can lead to feelings of exhilaration, liberation, or terrible frustration.  So, sometimes it’s good to know that we’re “normal.” But given that we’re UUs, we probably don’t want to be normal in every way.

 

            “Church Metaphors: lyrical, poetic, provocative”


·        An oasis of care in a desert of selfishness.

·        A heavy cart, pulled by the same strong horses.

·        A church that profoundly knows what it does not believe, but doesn’t know what it does believe.

·        This church is like molasses—healthy, good for you, messy, and slow.

·        A lovely rosebud, always near opening but never quite flowering. What gets in the way? Thorns of dissent? Lack of sufficient fertilizer? Hiding from the sunshine?

·        A high-topped walking shoe. The button hooks to do it up are increasingly hard to find.

·        A ship with too many people wanting to steer it, so no one does.

·        There’s one in every crowd, and they’re all here at First Church.

·        A shelter from the storm.

·        A friendly curmudgeon, unwilling to take risks, but who has a million dollars in the bank.

·        A precious stone, a gem, but natural sediment has covered our glow.

·        A person searching for the right outfit, unable to choose, who arrives late and uncomfortably dressed.

·        What can you do for me? A reversal of the JFK question.

·        A car with a 20-gallon tank but stops to get a pint of gas, moves a couple of feet, then stops to refuel.

·        Drowning in our own stability.

·        A warm, loving family where I always feel welcome.


·        A windmill of committees, all flapping limply.

·        A tethered heart.

·        A slot machine, in which many people believe you put in a quarter and get a dollar’s worth out.

·        A question mark crowd in an exclamation point world.

·        A nursery, trying to meet the needs of the loudest whiners.

·        A caravan of eco-tourists, waiting for sherpas to carry the load.

·        The church of the holy endowment.

·        A tapestry. A rich and complex group of people with an ever-expanding capacity for sharing and connecting.

·        Good-hearted but not committed people.

·        A prayer that is afraid to call itself a prayer.


 

 

MESSAGE

When the General Assembly of the Unitarian Universalist Association met in Salt Lake City 5 years ago, one of our district consultants spent some time with a leader of the Mormons. He was told: “You know, Unitarian Universalists have a remarkable ability to attract visitors—proportionately many more than the Mormons do. But you’re lousy at holding on to them.... If your churches were half as successful at integrating and retaining members as we Mormons are, then Unitarian Universalism would be the most dangerous religion in America.”[1]

 

The most dangerous religion in America. That phrase may offend our sensibilities. Demure, peace-loving people like us would hardly wish to be thought of as “dangerous.” But don’t worry. In order to be the most dangerous religion in America we’d first have to accept the notion that we are a religion. 

To be the most dangerous religion in America we would also have to give up our self-image as an embattled minority, proud, but marginalized by society.

 

We would have to accept the reality that we are part of the majority of Americans who affirm

·         individual authority in religion

·         a separation of church and state

·         intellectual freedom

·         respect and equal opportunity for all people

·         the ongoing discovery of truth and understanding through science ... and

·         the betterment of society through the interaction of people from diverse backgrounds.

 

In decades and centuries past, Unitarians and Universalists were on the cutting edge of some of these liberalizing cultural shifts. But today, these have become mainstream ideas.

 

Next week is Banned Books Week. Banned Books Week is an important reminder that anti-intellectualism still exists. But we shouldn’t mislead ourselves into thinking that we UUs are the only ones who support freedom of conscience, and freedom of expression. We do ourselves a deep disservice by failing to see that we are allied with the majority of Americans on many issues that are important to us. 

 

***

Garrison Keillor wrote about the upcoming election: “This year, as in the past, Republicans will portray us Democrats as embittered academics, desiccated Unitarians, whacked out hippies and communards, people who talk to telephone poles, the party of the Deadheads....”

 

I imagine that you’ve heard Keillor poke fun at Unitarians before.  I’ve laughed many times at what he’s called us. I think that’s one of the best things about UUs: we can laugh at ourselves. But I also cringe. Because I believe Keillor is usually not laughing with us; he is laughing at us. When he says “desiccated Unitarians” he is not poking gentle fun, but has more of a disgusted, tragic tone.  He finds himself lumped with us, and a bit embarrassed to be in the company of those with the largest average income and highest average educational level of any religious group in the U.S. ...and are best known for what? For being made fun of by Garrison Keillor.

 

Keillor continues: “We have a sacred duty to bequeath...to our grandchildren [a country] in better shape than...we found it. We have a long way to go and we’re not getting any younger.”  He concludes by quoting Dante: “...the hottest place in Hell is reserved for those who in a time of crisis remain neutral.” 

 

But we’re Universalists. We don’t believe in hell, so we can ignore Dante’s metaphor. What a shame.

 

Did you hear me right? Yes, I said, “What a shame.” But—you might object—UUs don’t believe in shame!

 

Well, our movement is not based in shame, which can block the way to peace and joy and self-acceptance. But one of the worst things about us, in my opinion, is that we pretend there is no value in shame, guilt, or regret. This is unfortunate because these can be stepping stones toward improving ourselves, improving our governments, improving our churches.

 

I’m using the pronoun “we” pretty freely today. Please don’t get hung up thinking, “Oh, that doesn’t apply to meeee!”  I am, of course, speaking of “us” as a composite. You may not like being lumped into a composite, but that’s part of the responsibility you’ve taken on if you’re a church member: to face—and hopefully to improve—not only your own weaknesses, but our collective weaknesses.

 

***

In so many cases, the very thing which is best about us can also be that which is worst about us.

 

We are proudly congregational: neither dependent upon nor directed by a centralized authority. And...we are isolated.

 

We are self-sufficient—as a congregation, and as individuals.  And...we can be self-satisfied, feeling no need for and no connection with others.

 

Our theology: it’s beautifully ambiguous...as open-ended as the cosmos. Our theology: it’s nearly impossible to explain.

 

We draw inspiration from so many sources. And...we don’t want to recognize our own Christian roots.

 

We question authority. And...we defy authority, simply because it’s authority.

 

We don’t tell other people what they should do. And...we’re perplexed, because, actually, we do have expectations of each other, but somehow feel we shouldn’t.

 

So is Liberal religion just one big oxymoron? No. All religions are full of contradiction. We have the advantage of not taking our internal contradictions too seriously. One of our best qualities is our appreciation for irony, our appreciation for creative tension, for yin yang, for uncertainty, for life’s recipe of bitter and sweet.

 

One of our worst qualities is that we have little patience for the internal contradictions of anyone else.

 

At our best, we affirm and promote the inherent worth and dignity of every person. At our worst, we tolerate sin... oh, I’m not supposed to say that... I mean: evildoing... I mean: bad behavior... I mean: we put up with inappropriate behavior because we’re so afraid to violate anyone’s right to do their own thing.

 

At our best we affirm and promote the principles that make up the covenant among the congregations of the Unitarian Universalist Association. At our worst, we affirm these principles among ourselves, but we are unwilling to pool our resources, or risk our reputation, to promote them in the larger world.

 

At our best we are as the circuit riders, and the freedom riders, the abolitionists, the suffragettes... and the entrepreneurs who built this church and progressive businesses, civic institutions, cultural, medical, athletic, and environmental organizations throughout central Wisconsin. So many from this church have been the founders, leaders, and supporters of our community’s most vital organizations.

 

At our worst, we say that organizations are inherently corrupt and oppressive. (So the last thing we would want in our church is organization.)

 

Bobby Geisel helped me to understand the value of all kinds of organizations. As an advertiser, one of his great gifts was drawing out the best that he saw in people and in groups. He showed us that business leaders were very often “builders of community” as employers, and socially responsible citizens.  He helped others to discover and to present their best selves, just like (we hope) teachers do, and hairdressers, and supervisors, and mentors, and parents.

 

Bobby and so many of his generation were the bedrock of this congregation for decades. We have mourned the passing of so many of the best over the last few years.

 

Bobby’s death represents the passing of a generation. He was one of only a handful of people to pass from birth to death within this congregation. He was one of a small minority raised Unitarian, or Universalist, or Unitarian Universalist, or Universalist Unitarian, to remain in a UU congregation.

 

Of course this awful situation is also one of the best things about us.  We teach our children about various religious traditions; we take them to visit different houses of worship.  We teach them that people with a wide range of religious perspectives are worthy and respectable.  Our kids know they won’t be condemned when they find their own path. So year after year, thousands of them go out into the world, and very few remain in our congregations.  This is fantastic.  We have thoroughly infiltrated mainstream American religion and secular culture. And nobody will ever suspect. Perhaps we are the most dangerous religion in America after all.

 

***

At our second best, UUs do a lot of good reflection, analysis, and criticism of theology.  Tied for 2nd best is our direct experience of that transcending mystery and wonder, whether we experience it through relationships, music, gardening, literature, or prayer. Also tied for 2nd best is our commitment to put our inspirations and insights into practice. At our very best, we do it all: experience, reflection, and practice, and then we do it again: experience, reflection, and practice....

 

At our worst, we interfere with our own experience, reflection, and practice, by twisting ourselves up in the semantics of god language.

 

***

Judy Blume writes: “It’s not just the books under fire now that worry me. It is the books that will never be written. The books that will never be read. And all due to the fear of censorship. As always, young readers will be the real losers.”

 

One of the best things about UUs is that we work hard to ensure that this doesn’t happen to our young readers.  Despite the discouraging results of the recent National Endowment for the Humanities survey which showed a serious drop in literary reading among all age groups, we promote a very free literary inquiry right here with two libraries, an annual book sale, a book group, and great role modeling.

 

But does our enthusiasm for fiction carry over into the realm of religion? Not always. For some reason we find fiction imaginative, but religion superstitious.

 

To rephrase Judy Blume: It’s not just the religions under fire now that worry me. It is the religions that will never be invented. The religions that will never be practiced. And all due to self-censorship. As always, young souls will be the real losers.

 

***

Freedom and reason are clearly among our greatest strengths—but only if we understand that freedom and reason, like tolerance, are tools. They are not ends in themselves. We can get so obsessed with freedom that we fail to fulfill its potential.

 

Reason is a great tool. But we miss out on a lot when we so overemphasize reason that we leave intuition and emotion out of our search for understanding. And we fool ourselves if we think that reason is going to extricate us from life’s absurdity and chaos.

 

***

One fabulous thing about this UU congregation is our labyrinthine 90-year-old building. One of the worst things is this fabulous labyrinthine 90-year-old building. One consolation of doing so many memorial services over the past few years is that I get to talk to the adult children who grew up in this church. Peter Langlois told me last month that the sanctuary smells the same way it did 50 years ago. (This was a good thing!) Many have told me how much they remember and appreciate their Sunday School teachers, who they are happy to see again when they return. But they also invariably remember adventurous romps through winding passageways. Those kids, some now 60 years old, really did chase down learning, and they are still excited about it.

 

But I also must explain why this first set of lights is not on. This one started sparking and smoking when it was turned on Friday afternoon.  Some of you may have thought it was part of the program when that 3rd set of lights suddenly went out in the middle of our last Sunday service. It wasn’t; we still don’t know why that circuit blew.

 

***

What is best about us... is not what we have but what we give. Not what we preserve, but what we transmit beyond ourselves.

 

What is best about us is that instead of walking a narrow path, on which we would be likely to fall, instead we can admit that we need one another, along side, to help keep us in balance.

 

What is best about us is that we are willing to come together periodically, not simply to get our own needs met, but, setting aside our own needs, we sit together and we place ourselves in quiet submission to the overwhelming otherness of that which lies beyond us.

 

A couple of years ago, I called about 50 people and asked them what question was at the top of their minds.  During the following Sunday service, we read their responses. I can’t remember who it was that asked “Where is Osama Bin Laden?”  But I’ll never forget Russ Wilson’s question. He asked, “How can I help?”

 

What is best about this congregation is that you trust and forgive one another. This congregation is patient, calm, and low-maintenance. I gotta remember that these are good things.

 

***

At our worst, we get stuck trying to satisfy everyone. At our best, we realize that it is not our purpose as a congregation to satisfy people, but to help them coordinate their powers to create a more just and humane world.

 

I’ve been offering you a horribly mixed message today: we’re not special, let’s get over ourselves. And also: We are so special, let’s celebrate and promote ourselves!  If paradoxically, both of these are true (and I think they are) then what are we to do?

 

We can continue to be our best, and to nurture the best in others: our leaders... and our behind-the-scenes people who cleaned up after the potluck last week though no one even asked... or the people who escort visitors to coffee hour, and tell newcomers why they keep coming back to this crazy / mixed up / best and worst kind of church.

 

What else can we do? We can continue to seek to be spiritually grounded. We can analyze and critique contemporary religion, while we also open ourselves to first hand religious experience. We can drop our defenses long enough to be filled and fueled for our difficult journey. We can put away our ego and skepticism for a little while every day, to receive the holy spirit.

 

If I’m so aggravated by our collective weaknesses, why do I stick with Unitarian Universalism? I’d love to learn from you why you’ve been stalwart members for years or decades. Please talk with one another about this now over coffee. For me, it’s because I think we are best at doing what is most important in religion: the everyday work of living out our values in our homes, neighborhoods, schools, workplaces, polling places, and community service organizations, and making this world a better place.

 

COMMUNITY FOCUS COLLECTION            Hurricane Relief

 

BENEDICTION        

May the light around us guide our footsteps, and hold us to the good that we seek.

 

May the darkness around us nurture our dreams,

and give us rest so that we may give ourselves to the work of our world.

 

Let us seek to remember the wholeness of our lives,

the weaving of light and shadow in this great and astonishing dance in which we move.

        – adapted from Kathleen McTigue



[1]Rev. Bill Sinkford, “In From the Margins,” Meadville/Lombard Newsletter, Fall 2003.